The Hidden Costs & Rewards of PRMIA ORM

In the complex and ever-evolving landscape of financial services, operational risk stands as a critical challenge. Organizations worldwide are increasingly prioritizing robust risk management frameworks to safeguard their assets, reputation, and continuity. This heightened focus has driven demand for skilled professionals capable of identifying, assessing, mitigating, and monitoring operational risks effectively. Enter the PRMIA Operational Risk Management (ORM) certification – a credential designed to validate and elevate expertise in this vital domain.

But like any significant professional investment, pursuing the PRMIA ORM comes with its own set of considerations. It's not merely about the exam fee; there are hidden costs in terms of time, effort, and opportunity. Conversely, the rewards can be substantial, opening doors to advanced career opportunities and a significant boost in professional credibility. This article aims to provide a neutral, decision-focused, and practical guide to help you determine if the PRMIA ORM certification is worth your investment, meticulously dissecting both the costs and the potential rewards. We'll explore what is PRMIA ORM certification, its structure, preparation demands, and the tangible career benefits it offers.

Understanding the PRMIA ORM Certification: A Gateway to Expertise

What is the PRMIA ORM Certification?

The Professional Risk Managers' International Association (PRMIA) offers the Operational Risk Management (ORM) Certificate as a globally recognized credential. It's specifically designed for risk professionals, auditors, regulators, and anyone involved in the operational risk management function within financial institutions and other industries. The certification aims to provide candidates with a comprehensive understanding of operational risk management principles, tools, and techniques, aligning with global best practices.

Earning this certificate demonstrates a commitment to professional development and a solid grasp of the core tenets required to manage operational risks effectively. It covers everything from governance to capital allocation, ensuring a holistic understanding. For those looking to deepen their knowledge or embark on a specialized path, the PRMIA Operational Risk Management (ORM) course offerings often serve as a strong foundational stepping stone.

Key Benefits of Earning the PRMIA ORM

The PRMIA ORM certification benefits extend far beyond a mere resume line item. It signifies a profound understanding of operational risk, a skill set that is highly valued by employers. Here are some of the key advantages:

• Enhanced Credibility: The PRMIA brand is well-respected in the global risk management community, lending significant weight to your professional profile.
• Comprehensive Knowledge: The program provides a structured curriculum that covers all essential aspects of operational risk, ensuring a robust understanding.
• Career Advancement: Holding the ORM certificate can open doors to more senior and specialized roles within risk management, audit, and compliance departments.
• Global Recognition: The certification is recognized internationally, making it valuable for professionals working in multinational environments or those seeking opportunities abroad.
• Networking Opportunities: Becoming part of the PRMIA community connects you with a vast network of risk professionals worldwide.

For a detailed overview of the program's objectives and the value it adds, you can visit the official PRMIA ORM certification page.

Deconstructing the PRMIA ORM Exam: What to Expect

Exam Overview and Requirements

Before diving into preparation, it's crucial to understand the nuts and bolts of the PRMIA ORM exam. The exam name is PRMIA Operational Risk Management, with the exam code ORM. To be eligible for the exam, there are typically no strict PRMIA ORM certification requirements beyond registering and paying the fee, making it accessible to a wide range of professionals. However, a foundational understanding of finance or risk concepts is highly recommended for success.

• Exam Name: PRMIA Operational Risk Management
• Exam Code: ORM
• Duration: 120 Minutes
• Number of Questions: 60 multiple-choice questions
• Passing Score: 60%

The exam is designed to test your conceptual understanding and application of operational risk principles, not just rote memorization.

The PRMIA ORM Exam Topics: A Deep Dive into the Syllabus

The PRMIA ORM syllabus is meticulously structured to provide a comprehensive understanding of operational risk. Familiarity with the PRMIA ORM exam topics is your first step towards effective preparation. Here's a breakdown of the key areas:

• Introduction: Sets the stage, defining operational risk, its scope, and importance in modern finance.
• Risk Governance: Covers the frameworks, roles, and responsibilities for managing risk within an organization, including risk culture and appetite.
• Risk Management Framework: Details the components of a robust risk management system, from identification to monitoring.
• Risk Assessment: Focuses on methods for identifying, analyzing, and evaluating operational risks, including qualitative and quantitative techniques.
• Risk Information: Emphasizes the importance of data, reporting, and communication in effective operational risk management.
• Compliance Risk: Explores the specific challenges and management strategies related to regulatory and legal compliance.
• Operational Risk Capital: Delves into the methodologies for calculating and managing capital for operational risk, often aligned with Basel Accords.
• Operational Resilience: A newer but critical area, focusing on an organization's ability to prevent, adapt, respond to, and recover from disruptions.
• Case Studies: Practical application of concepts through real-world scenarios, testing problem-solving skills.

For a complete and in-depth view of the curriculum, including learning objectives for each section, it's highly recommended to consult the PRMIA ORM Guidebook.

PRMIA ORM Exam Format and Duration

The PRMIA ORM exam format consists of 60 multiple-choice questions. You are given 120 minutes (2 hours) to complete the exam. This translates to approximately two minutes per question, highlighting the need for efficient time management during the test. Questions are designed to test your understanding of concepts and your ability to apply them in various scenarios. While there is no negative marking, careful reading of each question and all answer choices is crucial to avoid common pitfalls. The PRMIA ORM exam duration requires sustained focus.

The Investment: Costs Beyond the Exam Fee

PRMIA ORM Exam Cost: A Financial Breakdown

The most direct cost associated with the PRMIA ORM certification is the exam fee itself. PRMIA offers tiered pricing based on membership status, which can significantly impact the PRMIA ORM exam cost. Here's a breakdown:

• Sustaining Member Price: $549
• Contributing Member Price: $572
• Non-member Price: $599

Becoming a PRMIA member, particularly a Sustaining Member, not only reduces your exam fee but also provides access to a wealth of resources, including webinars, publications, and networking opportunities that can be invaluable for your professional development. It's a cost-benefit analysis to consider whether the membership fee justifies the exam discount and additional resources.

Hidden Costs: Study Materials and Practice

Beyond the official exam fee, there are several other costs, often hidden, that contribute to the overall investment in your PRMIA ORM certification. These include:

• Study Guides and Books: While PRMIA provides a guidebook, many candidates opt for supplementary materials. Investing in the best books for PRMIA ORM exam preparation can be a wise decision. These could include official textbooks, third-party study guides, or academic texts on operational risk.
• Practice Questions and Mock Exams: Access to high-quality PRMIA ORM practice questions and full-length mock exams is critical for solidifying your understanding and familiarizing yourself with the exam format. These resources often come with a separate cost.
• Online Courses and Bootcamps: Some candidates prefer structured learning environments. Enrolling in a PRMIA Operational Risk Management (ORM) course or a specialized bootcamp can be a significant expense but offers guided instruction and a disciplined approach to preparation.
• Time Investment: Perhaps the most significant hidden cost is your time. Preparing for the ORM exam requires a substantial commitment of hours, often balancing study with work and personal life. This opportunity cost should not be underestimated.

Strategizing for Success: How to Pass the PRMIA ORM Exam

Passing the PRMIA ORM exam requires more than just knowing the material; it demands a strategic approach to preparation and exam taking. Understanding the nuances of how to pass PRMIA ORM exam is key.

Effective Study Techniques and Resources

Developing a solid study plan is paramount. Begin by thoroughly reviewing the PRMIA Operational Risk Management (ORM) study guide and the official syllabus to identify your strengths and weaknesses. Focus your efforts on areas where you need improvement. Here are some PRMIA ORM exam preparation tips:

• Structured Study Schedule: Allocate dedicated time slots for studying each week and stick to them. Consistency is more important than cramming.
• Concept Mastery: Don't just memorize definitions. Strive to understand the underlying concepts and how they apply in real-world scenarios, especially with the case study component.
• Utilize Diverse Resources: Combine official materials with supplementary books. Many candidates find value in a range of study aids. For additional insights on effective certification preparation, you can explore resources on general exam strategies and tips on ProcessNews for certification exam success.
• Flashcards and Summaries: Create your own flashcards for key terms, formulas, and concepts. Summarizing chapters in your own words can also aid retention.

Leveraging Practice Questions and Mock Exams

This is arguably the most crucial part of your preparation. Engaging with ample PRMIA ORM practice questions helps you:

• Gauge Your Understanding: Identify areas where your knowledge is weak and needs further review.
• Familiarize with Question Styles: Understand the types of questions asked and how they are phrased.
• Improve Time Management: Practice answering questions within the allocated time to build speed and efficiency for the 120-minute duration.
• Build Confidence: Successfully answering practice questions boosts morale and reduces exam-day anxiety.

Understanding the PRMIA Operational Risk Management (ORM) Pass Rate

PRMIA does not publicly disclose specific pass rates for the ORM exam. However, like most professional certifications, it is designed to be challenging. Success requires diligent preparation and a thorough understanding of the material. It's not an exam you can simply walk into and expect to pass without significant effort. The rigor ensures that those who earn the credential truly possess the necessary expertise.

How to Pass PRMIA ORM Exam: Key Strategies

Beyond studying, strategic exam-taking can make a difference. Read each question carefully, eliminating obviously incorrect answers first. Don't spend too much time on a single question; if you're stuck, make an educated guess and move on. Review your answers if time permits. For a comprehensive overview of the exam content and valuable preparation advice, visit ProcessExam for PRMIA ORM exam details.

The Rewards: Unlocking Career Growth with PRMIA ORM

Enhanced Career Prospects and PRMIA ORM Jobs

One of the most compelling rewards of achieving your PRMIA ORM certification is the significant boost it can give to your career prospects. The demand for skilled operational risk professionals is consistently high across financial institutions, consulting firms, and even non-financial corporations. Holding the ORM certificate makes you a highly attractive candidate for a variety of PRMIA ORM jobs, including:

• Operational Risk Analyst/Manager
• Risk Consultant
• Compliance Officer
• Internal Auditor
• Regulatory Affairs Specialist
• Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Professional

The certification signals to employers that you possess a specialized skill set and a dedicated commitment to the field, differentiating you in a competitive job market. Staying updated on industry trends can also give you an edge; explore insights into career paths and opportunities in risk management through our dedicated articles on ProcessNews for professional development.

The PRMIA ORM Certification Salary Advantage

While specific salary figures can vary widely based on experience, location, and the size/type of the employer, the PRMIA ORM certification salary tends to be notably higher for certified professionals compared to their non-certified counterparts. This credential often justifies a premium in compensation due to the specialized knowledge and skills it validates. The return on investment (ROI) for the time and financial commitment can be substantial, as the certification can lead to:

• Higher starting salaries for new hires with the credential.
• Significant salary increases for existing professionals seeking promotion or new roles.
• Access to more lucrative consulting engagements.

The value placed on operational risk expertise means that professionals who can demonstrate this proficiency are rewarded accordingly. For more insights on the professional landscape and frequently asked questions about the certification's impact, refer to the PRMIA Operational Risk Manager FAQs.

Is the PRMIA ORM Certification Worth Your Investment?

Ultimately, the decision of whether the PRMIA ORM certification is "worth it" is a personal one, dependent on your career aspirations, current role, and financial situation. However, based on a comprehensive evaluation of both the costs and the rewards, we can draw some conclusions.

The costs are undeniable: several hundred dollars for the exam fee, potentially hundreds more for study materials, and a significant time commitment of dozens, if not hundreds, of hours. This is a serious investment that requires discipline and dedication.

However, the rewards are equally compelling. The PRMIA ORM offers enhanced credibility, a deep and comprehensive understanding of operational risk, and significantly improved career prospects with a potential for higher earning potential. In an industry where operational resilience and robust risk management are paramount, possessing a specialized credential like the ORM positions you as a valuable asset.

If you are a professional working in or aspiring to a role in operational risk, compliance, internal audit, or enterprise risk management, and you are serious about advancing your career and deepening your expertise, the PRMIA ORM certification presents a strong value proposition. It's an investment in your future that can yield substantial returns, making you a more competent, confident, and sought-after professional in the risk management landscape.

Conclusion

The PRMIA Operational Risk Management (ORM) certification is more than just an exam; it's a strategic investment in your professional future. While it demands a considerable outlay of time and money – from the PRMIA ORM exam cost to hours spent on PRMIA ORM practice questions and mastering the PRMIA Operational Risk Management (ORM) syllabus – the potential rewards are substantial. Enhanced career opportunities, competitive PRMIA ORM certification salary prospects, and profound industry recognition make a compelling case for its value.

By thoroughly understanding the PRMIA ORM exam topics, committing to a diligent study plan, and leveraging available resources, you can confidently navigate the challenges and emerge with a highly respected credential. If you are dedicated to excelling in the dynamic field of operational risk, the PRMIA ORM certificate is undoubtedly a powerful tool to validate your expertise and propel your career forward. Make an informed decision, prepare diligently, and unlock the hidden rewards awaiting you.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is the primary benefit of PRMIA ORM certification?

The primary benefit of PRMIA ORM certification is the enhanced credibility and specialized knowledge it provides in operational risk management. It demonstrates a globally recognized expertise, leading to better career opportunities and higher earning potential.

2. How much does the PRMIA ORM exam cost?

The PRMIA ORM exam cost varies by membership status: Sustaining Members pay $549, Contributing Members pay $572, and Non-members pay $599. These fees do not include costs for study materials or practice exams.

3. What are the main topics covered in the PRMIA ORM syllabus?

The PRMIA ORM syllabus covers key areas such as Introduction to Operational Risk, Risk Governance, Risk Management Framework, Risk Assessment, Risk Information, Compliance Risk, Operational Risk Capital, Operational Resilience, and Case Studies.

4. How long does it take to prepare for the PRMIA ORM exam?

Preparation time for the PRMIA ORM exam varies based on prior knowledge and study habits, but typically candidates dedicate 80-120 hours of focused study. This includes reviewing materials, practicing questions, and understanding concepts.

5. What kind of jobs can I get with PRMIA ORM certification?

With a PRMIA ORM certification, you can pursue various roles such as Operational Risk Analyst, Operational Risk Manager, Risk Consultant, Compliance Officer, Internal Auditor, or other specialized positions within enterprise risk management across financial and non-financial sectors.

Continue reading

The Future of Risk Management: Technology and Innovation in Risk Assessment

In today's world, risk management has become increasingly important. Businesses face numerous risks, from financial and operational to reputational and regulatory. As technology continues to advance at a rapid pace, it is no surprise that the future of risk management is closely linked to technology and innovation. In this article, we will explore the role of technology and innovation in risk management and the impact it can have on businesses.

Introduction

Risk management has always been a crucial aspect of any business. It involves identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks that can affect the organization's operations, finances, and reputation. With the ever-evolving business landscape and the increasing complexity of risks, risk management has become even more critical.

The Role of Technology in Risk Management

Technology has transformed the way businesses operate, and it has had a significant impact on risk management. It has enabled businesses to manage risks more efficiently and effectively. Below are some ways in which technology has influenced risk management:

Read More: PMI Risk Management Professional (PMI-RMP)

Automation

Automation has made risk management more efficient and streamlined. It has allowed businesses to automate repetitive tasks, such as data collection and analysis, which has saved time and reduced the risk of human error.

Big Data Analytics

Big data analytics has enabled businesses to gather and analyze vast amounts of data to identify and mitigate risks. It has allowed businesses to detect patterns and trends that would be difficult to identify manually, which has helped them to make better-informed decisions.

Artificial Intelligence

Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized risk management by enabling businesses to analyze data and identify risks in real-time. It has allowed businesses to predict and prevent risks before they occur, which has helped to minimize losses.

Cybersecurity

As businesses become more reliant on technology, the risk of cyber attacks increases. Cybersecurity has become a critical aspect of risk management, and technology has played a significant role in enhancing cybersecurity measures.

The Impact of Innovation in Risk Management

Innovation is critical to the future of risk management. It involves exploring new ideas, technologies, and approaches to managing risks. Below are some ways in which innovation can impact risk management:

Predictive Analytics

Predictive analytics is an innovative approach to risk management that involves using data, statistical algorithms, and machine learning techniques to identify risks and predict potential outcomes. It can help businesses to make better-informed decisions and take proactive measures to manage risks.

Blockchain Technology

Blockchain technology is an innovative approach to managing risks that involves creating a decentralized and secure digital ledger. It can help businesses to manage risks related to fraud, data breaches, and cyber attacks.

Internet of Things (IoT)

The IoT is an innovative approach to managing risks that involves connecting devices, sensors, and machines to the internet. It can help businesses to monitor and manage risks in real-time, which can help to prevent losses.

Conclusion

The future of risk management is closely linked to technology and innovation. Technology has enabled businesses to manage risks more efficiently and effectively, while innovation has provided new approaches to managing risks. As businesses continue to face complex risks, it is essential to embrace technology and innovation to stay ahead of the curve.

Continue reading

Top 5 Risk Analysis Methods That You Should Know

Risk analysis has become an integral part of every organization. There a multitude of risk analysis methods to use today. However, why do we need to perform risk analysis? 

A lot of small and medium-sized businesses are facing cyberattacks. They are more at risk than larger enterprises because their security measures are often weaker. Small and medium-sized enterprises believe that their size of operations makes them less of a target. Still, cyber attackers find it a lot easier to find vulnerabilities and launch attacks on their business than the larger organizations. 

A recent study stated that 78% of all participating companies in the United States survey faced a cyber attack in the last year, out of which a majority were smaller sized companies. A stable way of understanding and managing risks to companies is to invest in risk management tools and practices to protect their company’s most valuable assets. Risk analysis is a big part of the risk management strategy that needs to be implemented for the risk management plan to work. The article discusses what risk analysis is and the most popular methods of conducting a risk analysis for companies.

What is Risk Analysis?

There are many types of risks and threats that companies of all sizes need to prepare measures for. These risks can arise from malpractices, lack of optimal efficiency in operations, cyber attacks, exposed vulnerabilities in the firewall, using unsafe applications, and more. Risk analysis is a means by which organizations can identify these vulnerabilities, threats, and risks to their company and then create strategies to protect themselves against these risks.

Risk analysis deals with identifying risks and potential threats to a company’s operations and processes and analyzing them to measure their severity of impact and likelihood of occurrence. A risk analysis process typically centers around a few fundamental steps. These steps are common to the different risk analysis methods and are applied in different forms using various means.

Key Steps Involved in the Risk Analysis Method

The most basic and skeletal steps that are involved in any method used to conduct risk analysis are:

◉ Identification of threats, vulnerabilities, and uncertainties

◉ Understanding the impact of these threats, vulnerabilities, and uncertainties

◉ Creating or using a model for risk analysis

◉ A sampling of the model to understand the threats, vulnerabilities, and uncertainties better

◉ Analyzing the results obtained from the above steps

◉ Implementing a risk management plan to manage these threats, vulnerabilities, and uncertainties based on the results of the analysis

Risk Analysis Methods 

There are two types of risk analysis and assessments conducted in organizations. They are qualitative risk analysis methods and quantitative methods of risk analysis. The qualitative methods are widely used means for companies to assess and monitor day-to-day risks faced by them. This makes them widely used approaches. The different risk analysis methods are used based on the type of organization, type of project, and more.

Risk analysis and management experts are usually the ones who know what risk analysis methods are best suited for specific projects. Using the right method is also important because it can determine the project’s success rate. Some of the most commonly used and popular risk analysis methods are listed below:

◉ Delphi Technique of Risk Analysis

◉ Decision Tree Analysis 

◉ Probability and Consequence Matrix

◉ SWIFT Analysis 

◉ Bow-Tie Analysis

Delphi Technique for Risk Analysis

The Delphi technique for risk analysis is quite similar to a brainstorming session. The concerned teams must work with risk analysts and other security specialists to come up with different potential threats and vulnerabilities to their organization or project. The crucial point of what makes the Delphi technique works is that it uses risk professionals and experts. Without utilizing the expert skills, it becomes no different from a regular brainstorming session and will not yield very successful results.

After the brainstorming session is complete, risk analysts and team members work together to evaluate their identified risks and analyze them. All the experts make their lists of potential threats and their evaluations individually and then compare them to create a complete risk register to document all the risks before creating a risk management strategy.

Decision Tree Analysis 

The decision tree analysis is used to create various outcomes or consequences of an action. This risk analysis method is widely used because project teams can be prepared for any and all possible outcomes and create strategies to ensure that they can achieve the best one. The decision tree analysis is used to chart or create a pathway for teams to follow to avoid risks and follow the best course of action for their project. 

A decision tree analysis is mainly used when project teams do not know or are uncertain of the final outcome. This way, they can gauge the different possibilities and prepare for the worst of them, and expect the best. The process involves creating different outcomes, analyzing the probabilities of them occurring, and then creating a pathway or a course of action to achieve the best results.

Probability and Consequence Matrix

This is the most widely used method of understanding the impact and severity of any risk. The probability and consequence matrix is created to help teams rank the identified threats, vulnerabilities, and risks. This is done to identify how severe a risk could be if materialized. The severity of risks is calculated by multiplying the level of impact of the risk against the likelihood or probability of the risk-taking place.

By identifying and calculating the different factors of risk in the probability and consequence matrix, it also becomes easier for risk analysts and professionals to work with teams and come up with various risk avoidance and mitigation strategies for risk management.

SWIFT Analysis 

The SWIFT Analysis stands for Structured What If Technique. This analysis method is used to understand the consequence and viability of all risks in projects based on different changes made to any aspect of a project. The risk analysis and project team evaluate all the changes made to the project based on the changes made in the project’s design or plan and use them to identify different Opportunity Risks to the project.

Bow-Tie Analysis

The bow-tie analysis is one of the most practical approaches to risk management. It helps teams understand the risks and consequences of the risks reasonably, which makes coming up with a risk mitigation strategy a lot simpler. The process is quite straightforward:

◉ The team identifies various risk events to a project or to the organization

◉ Then, the team divides each individual risk event into two sides: On one side, all the possible causes for the risk event taking place are listed. On the other side, all the possible consequences and impacts of the risk are listed

◉ The risk professionals then analyze and create barriers or other mitigation methods to every cause of risk to prevent the consequence of the risk

Final Thoughts

Risk analysis is an important part of all projects and organizations’ security. Risks can directly impact a project’s success and can negatively affect the company by causing a loss in reputation, loss in revenue, and more. To protect the organization and its projects from these threats, certified risk management professionals are hired. The risk management certification helps all project managers, IT professionals, and security professionals increase their knowledge and expertise in the field.

Source: invensislearning.com

Continue reading

Risk Analysis Definition – Understanding the Fundamentals of Risk Analysis

All businesses have a requirement to fulfill, and their business processes, applications, projects, and more, always come with certain risks that they need to ascertain and take care of. This means that regardless of an employee’s job role within a company, they will face a task that involves risk. There are two main elements of risk. The first one is the risk in itself, and the second element is the impact of the risk. The agenda of this post is to clearly explain the risk analysis definition and how to evaluate risks associated with a project.

Finding out the risks in a business and properly handling risks to avoid their consequences is crucial to a company’s success. Failing to do so can affect the organization’s revenue, and operations, and can even lead to failures in projects. A recent survey conducted showed that 92% of organizations agreed that one of the most important factors that lead to a successful enterprise is information about risk. A proper understanding of what risks are is crucial to managing them successfully. 

Let us begin this post by understanding exactly the meaning of risk to an enterprise.

What is Risk?

A risk to an enterprise can be any form of threat that can hinder a company’s growth. It can lead to a negative impact on the enterprise’s revenue and can impact the success of their projects. Any cause of delay in delivery of projects or an issue with the quality of the project that leads to it not meeting its original target and goal can be considered to be a risk to the business.

There can be various reasons for risks occurring in a project. They are always not necessarily internal issues and can be external factors as well. Not being able to successfully account for any external factors is also considered to be a risk. Some factors that can cause risks in a company are:

◉ Increase in competition

◉ Changes in regulations

◉ Increase in price of material

◉ Additions to government laws and guidelines

Next in this post let us look at the risk analysis definition.

Risk Analysis Definition

The process involved with the identification and management of any uncertainties or risks that could impact business goals or financial goals is known as risk analysis. A successful risk analysis starts with the accurate identification of risks and threats that an organization or a project could face. The next step is identifying the severity of these threats and the likelihood of them occurring.

Risk analysis requires many factors to be taken into consideration. These are often complex, which is why organizations tend to employ various applications to streamline and identify all risks. These factors include, but are not limited to the following:

◉ Financial data of the company 

◉ Plans for all ongoing and future projects

◉ Various security protocols implemented in the organization

◉ Forecasts of the market and future trends

Risk analysis is crucial in avoiding future losses to the enterprise. The planning tool can help companies save a lot of time and resources that would have been spent otherwise in dealing with the fallout if the risks materialize, and it could also have a negative impact on the company’s reputation in the market.

Importance of Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is extremely beneficial to organizations because it helps protect the company against any unprecedented losses and helps maintain the organization’s image in the market. Some of the reasons why risk analysis is considered to be a really important aspect of running any organization are listed below:

◉ Risk analysis helps prevent any potential losses to the company’s finances: Before implementing any strategy or starting a new process, conducting a thorough risk analysis is ideal. It is a big investment, but it is worth the expense. A risk analysis can help businesses prevent future losses by identifying potentially harmful situations beforehand so the company can take measures to prevent them

◉ A risk analysis safeguard’s an organization’s security as well: Security breaches that can impact the information and data of an organization are another risk that can be avoided by conducting a risk analysis. Possible threats to the security of an organization can be predicted with a risk analysis and there can be measures implemented to prevent the same

◉ Risk analysis can help increase the company’s profits: Risk analysis is more than just prevention. A benefit of conducting a risk analysis is that it can help companies increase their profits. Risk analysis does two things for an organization’s finances – protects them from unexpected threats and events and also increases the profits by strengthening the projects and improving the overall decision-making process

◉ Organizations can spot trends and improve their processes: Risk analysis helps with risk prevention as a whole. This means that with a complete risk analysis, organizations can spot any upcoming changes and trends in the future and create or alter processes to adapt to them

◉ Risk analysis helps plan for success: Risk analysis is extremely important in ensuring the success of projects in an organization, which ultimately leads to the company’s success. By delivering projects on time and with measures to safeguard against risks, organizations can guarantee their success over time. This improves the reputation of the company which adds to its success in the future

Now I will explain how you can efficiently evaluate project risk.

How to Evaluate Project Risk?

Evaluating project risks are important and need to be checked right from the planning stages of the project. To evaluate what risks are present in a project, a risk assessment needs to be conducted. There are various steps involved in the same:

◉ The first step is to identify potential risks to the project. Risks identified in previous projects can be used as a reference as well

◉ The second step is to understand the likelihood of these risks manifesting during the project lifecycle. The listed risks need to then be prioritized as high, medium, or low probability of occurrence

◉ The third step which will help assess every risk and prioritize it is to determine the level of its impact in case the risk materializes

Let us now understand the difference between Risk Analysis, Risk Assessment & Risk Management.

Risk Analysis vs Risk Assessment vs Risk Management

Risk Management

Risk management involves the following aspects of risk:

◉ Identification of risk

◉ Risk analysis

◉ Evaluation of risk

◉ Prioritization of risk

◉ Strategies to manage risk

Organizations normally invest in enterprise-wide risk management solutions to help them gather information about possible risks to the entire organization as a whole and not just in projects.

Risk Assessment

Risk assessment involves the following aspects of risk:

◉ Determining potential risks

◉ The probability of the risks taking place

◉ Impact of the risks

◉ Tolerance of the organization towards the risk

Risk assessment is a crucial part of risk management and normally involves various processes to accurately identify the risks and assess them.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis involves the following aspects of risk:

◉ Significance of the risks

◉ Quantified value of the risk

Risk analysis helps with risk assessment and in a broader sense, risk management.

Risk analysis and risk assessment are both important parts of the risk management process and can help in avoiding or mitigating any risk to a project or the organization as a whole.

Final Thoughts

Risk analysis helps determine the success of a project and helps improve the overall project’s structure and strategy of completion. The most accurate way of conducting a successful risk analysis of any project is through the help of a risk management platform. There are various tools available to organizations that help with the same.

Source: invensislearning.com

Continue reading

Top 20 Risk Management Interview Questions

Have you always felt attracted to analyzing the potential losses in the financial sector of an organization? If yes, then Risk Management is totally the career field you should be opting for.

Risk management is basically the identification, evaluation, and prioritization of risks (defined in ISO 31000 as the effect of uncertainty on objectives) followed by coordinated and economical application of resources to minimize, monitor, and control the probability or impact of unfortunate events or to maximize the realization of opportunities.

But higher the demand is, tougher the interview questions are. Hence, we have jotted down the top 20 Risk Management interview questions just for you!

Here you go!

Question 1. What Are The Company’s Top Risks, How Severe Is Their Impact And How Likely Are They To Occur?

Answer :

Managing enterprise risk at a strategic level requires focus, meaning generally emphasizing no more than five to 10 risks. Day-to-day risks are an ongoing operating responsibility.

Question 2. How Often Does The Company Refresh Its Assessment Of The Top Risks?

Answer :

The enterprise-wide risk assessment process should be responsive to change in the business environment. A robust process for identifying and prioritizing the critical enterprise risks, including emerging risks, is vital to an evergreen view of the top risks.

Question 3. Who Owns The Top Risks And Is Accountable For Results, And To Whom Do They Report?

Answer :

Once the key risks are targeted, someone or some group, function, or unit must own them. Gaps and overlaps in risk ownership should be minimized, if not eliminated.

Question 4. How Effective Is The Company In Managing Its Top Risks?

Answer :

A robust process for managing and monitoring each of the critical enterprise risks is essential to successful risk management, and risk management capabilities must be improved continuously as the speed and complexity of business change.

Question 5. Are There Any Organizational “blind Spots” Warranting Attention?

Answer :

Cultural issues and dysfunctional behavior can undermine the effectiveness of risk management and lead to inappropriate risk-taking or the undermining of established policies and processes. For example, lack of transparency, conflicts of interest, a shoot-the-messenger environment, and/or unbalanced compensation structures may encourage undesirable behavior and compromise the effectiveness of risk management.

Question 6. Does The Company Understand The Key Assumptions Underlying Its Strategy And Align Its Competitive Intelligence Process To Monitor External Factors For Changes That Could Alter Those Assumptions?

Answer :

A company can fall so in love with its business model and strategy that it fails to recognize changing paradigms until it is too late. While no one knows for sure what will happen that could invalidate the company’s strategic assumptions in the future, monitoring the validity of key assumptions over time as the business environment changes is a smart thing to do.

Question 7. Does The Company Articulate Its Risk Appetite And Define Risk Tolerances For Use In Managing The Business?

Answer :

The risk appetite dialogue helps to bring balance to the conversation around which risks the enterprise should take, which risks it should avoid, and the parameters within which it should operate going forward. The risk appetite statement is decomposed into risk tolerances to address the question, “How much variability are we willing to accept as we pursue a given business objective?” For example, separate risk tolerances may be expressed differently for objectives relating to earnings variability, interest rate exposure, and the acquisition, development, and retention of people.

Question 8. Does The Company’s Risk Reporting Provide Management And The Board Information They Need About The Top Risks And How They Are Managed?

Answer :

Risk reporting starts with relevant information about critical enterprise risks and how those risks are managed. Are there opportunities to enhance the risk reporting process to make it more effective and efficient? Is there a process for monitoring and reporting critical enterprise risks and emerging risks to executive management and the board?

Question 9. Is The Company Prepared To Respond To Extreme Events?

Answer :

Does the company have response plans for unlikely extreme events? Has it prioritized its high-impact, low-likelihood risks in terms of their reputational effect, velocity to impact, and persistence of impact, as well as the enterprise’s response readiness?

Question 10. Does The Board Have The Requisite Skill Set To Provide Effective Risk Oversight?

Answer :

To provide input to executive management regarding critical risk issues on a timely basis, directors must understand the business and industry, as well as how the changing environment impacts the business model.

Question 11. Who Is Responsible For The Enterprise Risk Management Or Risk Management Process?

Answer :

Without assigning someone clear accountability for the process of risk management, it is unlikely that risks would be identified, prioritized, and mitigated across an organization on a periodic basis and in a thorough way. In addition, it is unlikely to risk would be given the focus that is required to achieve a reasonable degree of control over the many uncertainties facing organizations in today’s highly dynamic marketplace.

Less important are such details as the title of the individual with the accountability or how large a budget or staff the individual is provided. A name, an accountable person is a key to ensuring that a sound process is in operating.

Question 12. What Are The Most Significant Risks To The Strategy, And What Is Being Done To Address These?

Answer :

Given that failures are generally caused by a strategic risk that has not been addressed rather than by a catastrophic storm or single cyberattack, for example, it is vital for organizations to know and deal with their strategic risks.

Strategic risks typically involve aspects of the business such as:

What is the organization’s vision of the future – does it take into account where technology, science, and other dynamic forces are going?
What is the mission – what does the organization make or sell, to whom and in which geographies?
What are the goals and objectives – how much does the organization want to grow, at what margins, keeping what capital and debt levels?
What are the values – how does the organization want to behave and be perceived in the marketplace?
What is the position with strategic partners, investors, and vendors?

Question 13. Is There A Single Risk Register That Collates All Significant Risks (strategic And Non-strategic), With Action Plans To Mitigate Them?

Answer :

Strategic and non-strategic risks of a certain magnitude should be combined into one risk register that allows management and the board to see:

all the major risks
what is being done to mitigate them
what is the progress against the risk mitigation plan

The board should expect to see such a report or ask for one, if it is not already being created.

Question 14. What Are The Top 10 Risks Overall?

Answer :

These should be top of mind for the organization’s senior team at all times and be a familiar topic of discussion with the board. Board members should consider if these make sense based on all the information they have been privy to about the organization.

Question 15. Do Individual Performance Plans Include Risk Management?

Answer :

If managing risk is really important to the organization, the individual performance plans of a large number of employees at different levels of the organization should include a specific objective or task related to risk management. Thus, the performance against these would be evaluated at regular intervals. It is well-known that what gets measured gets managed, and what gets rewarded gets attention.

Question 16. Who Is Responsible For Information Technology Security?

Answer :

Clear accountability for the task of ensuring IT security is also critical. With the risk of cyber breaches, demands for service, extortion, and stealing of bank accounts and intellectual property so high, an organization needs to ensure it has the necessary expertise to create a secure technological platform. This can be in the form of hired staff or expert contractors.

In the case of some recent, high-profile breaches, it appears that the role of chief information security officer (CISO) was either non-existent or that the individual filling the role was brand new. An inference can be drawn that a seasoned CISO who understood the organization might have made a difference.

Of course, having the role filled does not guarantee never having a security risk comes to fruition. But it does reduce the risk to some extent, and having a CISO makes the discovery and recovery from a breach or attack quicker and more efficient when one does occur.

Question 17. Do All Employees Get Some Information And Training On Identifying And Reporting A Risk? Is There A Risk Reporting “hot-line”?

Answer :

The answer to this question will give the board insight into several things. If there is a hot-line, it shows that the organization is seriously interested in identifying risks and that the topic of risk is being handled fairly transparently within the organization. If there is not one, the board may wonder why there is no channel for the rank and file to alert management about risks.

Question 18. Have Correlated Risks Been Looked For, And What Are They?

Answer :

Large and small organizations, alike, have the potential to harbor correlated risks. Correlated risks are a group of risks that might occur at the same time because there is a relationship of some sort among them. The aspect at play could be:

geography in common
a single source with multiple ties. For example, a company that has call centers, data processing, and manufacturing plants in a single Southeast Asia country has the potential for correlated risk if that country is hit by a natural catastrophe, political upheaval, or some other turbulence.  Another example is, if different product units of a manufacturing company use the same supplier for raw materials or OEM parts, there is the potential for correlated risk if that supplier is unable to deliver on its orders.

A correlation might also be in terms of chain reactions. One risk event may give rise to other risks, which is often true in the case of natural disasters such as earthquakes and hurricanes.

A question about correlated risks will not only elicit an answer about those risks but also provide insight as to whether the risk is being discussed in-depth and across organizational silos.

Question 19. Are A Business Continuity Plan And Disaster Recovery Plan In Place?

Answer :

No matter how robust a risk management process is, a company will experience catastrophes of one sort or another from time to time. There is a need for plans that deal with these because reaction speed is critically important in managing them well.

The business continuity plan has the aim of keeping all or some of the business running from another venue or with back-up systems or on-call staff, or whatever allows continuous operations. The disaster recovery plan has the mission to restore normal operations as quickly as possible after the business has been interrupted in whole or in part.

In reviewing these plans, key elements to look for include:

a communication hierarchy for notification that is complete and up to date
a decision tree for creating clarity around who can make which decisions
a list of third-party resources that have been previously vetted and can be called in to assist – some will be part of any insurance policies that may be triggered by the risk/loss event.

Question 20. What Risks Are Being Transferred By Insurance Versus What Is Being Mitigated Internally, And What Is The Quality Of The Insurer?

Answer :

Insurance can be an effective and efficient way to handle risk when it is used in a well-constructed fashion. The board will want to consider high-level issues such as:

Is the right set of risks covered; i.e. those that are less predictable, require special expertise, and are beyond the financial wherewithal of the organization to withstand?
Are the right limits being purchased; i.e. is the value of the policy high enough to truly cover a major loss?
How highly is the insurer rated, and what is its claims service reputation.

A way in which the board can judge the merit of the answers to these questions is to find out:

the kind of analysis that was done to determine the insurance program
who did the analysis
whether there is benchmark information to look at from comparable organizations.

There are, undoubtedly, other questions that the board may need to ask. These are an excellent starting place for getting a sense of how well the organization is addressing risk.

Continue reading

Risk Management: Objectives, Advantages And Disadvantages

Risk Management is the identification, assessment, and prioritization of risks followed by coordinated and economical application of resources to minimize, monitor, and control the probability and/or impact of unfortunate events. Risks can come from uncertainty in financial markets, project failures, legal liabilities, credit risks, accidents, natural causes and disasters as well as deliberate attacks from an adversary.

Risk management is the acceptance of responsibility for recognizing, identifying, and controlling the exposures to loss or injury which are created by the activities of the University. By contrast, insurance management involves responsibility for only those risks which are actually insured against.

Meaning and Definition of Risk Management

According to Jorion___” Risk management is the process by which various risk exposures are identified, measured and controlled. Our understanding of risk has been much improved by the development of derivatives markets”.

Accordingly, the term ‘risk management’ refers to the systematic application of principles, approach, and processes to the tasks of identifying and assessing risks, and then planning and implementing risk responses. This provides a disciplined environment for proactive decision-making.

Objectives of Risk Management

1. Ensure the management of risk is consistent with and supports the achievement of the strategic and corporate objectives.

2. Provide a high-quality service to customers.

3. Initiate action to prevent or reduce the adverse effects of risk.

4. Minimize the human costs of risks, Where reasonably practicable.

5. Meet statutory and legal obligations.

6. Minimize the financial and other negative consequences of losses and claims.

7. Minimize the risks associated with new developments and activities.

8. Be able to inform decisions and make choices on possible outcomes.

Advantages of Risk Management

1. It encourages the firm to think about its threats. In particular, risk management encourages it to analyze risks that might otherwise be overlooked.

2. In clarifying the risks, it encourages the firm to be better prepared. In other words, it helps the firm to manage itself better.

3. It lets the organization prioritize its investment and reduces internal disputes about how money should be spent.

4. It reduces duplication of systems. Integration of environmental and health and safety systems are one instance.

Disadvantages of Risk Management

1. Qualitative risk assessment is subjective and lacks consistency.

2. Unlikely events do occur but if the risk is unlikely enough to occur is maybe better to simply retain the risk and deal with the result if the loss does in fact occur.

3. Spending too much time assessing and managing unlikely risks can divert resources that could be used more profitably.

Continue reading

Six Sigma Methodology for Credit Risk and Credit Scoring

Six Sigma is today’s dynamic management approach for improving the quality of products and processes. Financial institutions are embracing Six Sigma. American Express, Citibank and GE are well advanced in the implementation of the methodology. Jack Welch, when he was the CEO of GE, said it was the most important initiative that the company had taken – “part of the genetic code of our future leadership.” Six Sigma is a mindset that ensures problems are approached with rationality and based on a scientific procedure. So why do some credit risk managers resist Six Sigma, even in organizations that embrace the methodology?

Arguments Against the Methodology in Risk

Here are the six most common concerns risk managers voice about Six Sigma and responses to them.

1. Six Sigma Adds Work to Projects: It is easy to assume that a project is required and so the Six Sigma methodology must be followed. But, not every decision is a Six Sigma project. For example, a decision has to be made about modifications to the credit bureau link due to regulatory changes. If there is only one option, then there is no point in going through the methodology. If there is no problem to solve, the methodology need not be used.

2. There’s Enough Analysis Going on: But is there paralysis of analysis? Credit risk analysis has never been better. However, much of what is produced is data rather than real information. It is natural to want to measure as much as possible. But, most times, less is more. Six Sigma helps risk managers discover the critical metrics. More about this later, in the examination of where Six Sigma fits into what the risk department does.

3. There Isn’t a Problem: Don’t wait for a problem, find one. At GE, employees are trained to not accept things the way they are, but to consider how they should be. For example, collections performance may be acceptable, but it can always be improved. This is not like the old “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” principle. The challenge is to find ways to improve the processes and solve the problems that have the biggest impact on the bottom line.

4. Six Sigma Requires a Cumbersome Project Team: Companies that have a Six Sigma program have a quality team comprised of Six Sigma experts known as Black Belts and Master Black Belts. Sometimes companies can mistakenly become more wrapped up in the structure rather than the methodology. The philosophy can be applied to everything risk managers do without the need for a formal structure involving quality experts outside the function. Credit risk people should have a scientific rigor to what they do. The principles of Six Sigma should be a natural part of their work.

5. The Concepts of Defects and DPMO Don’t Apply to Credit Risk: The term “Six Sigma” is derived from six standard deviations (sigma) from the mean. The normal probability of being further from the mean than six sigma is 0.0003 percent. In other words, the chance of an occurrence beyond this point is 300 times in a million outcomes, or, in Six Sigma terminology, 3.4 defects per million opportunities (DPMO). Not every problem involves errors and hence DPMO. However, it would be a mistake to assume that Six Sigma does not apply because of this.

6. Six Sigma Is Just About Improving Quality: While Six Sigma is primarily about improving the quality perceived by a customer from a process, this does not mean that the principles cannot be applied to improving credit quality or profitability. More generally, this could be re-labeled “critical to achieving our goal.” Rather than get hung up on Six Sigma terms like critical to quality (CTQ), think of them as mere labels that provide a common language.

Six Sigma in Credit Risk Management

Everything risk managers do can be viewed as being part of a Six Sigma project. This may be obvious for general projects, but it equally applies to scorecard tracking and portfolio monitoring. To demonstrate the stages of DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control), here is a simple project: The risk manager has been asked to review underwriting with a view to improving the manual decisioning.

In the Define phase, the risk manager may gain agreement to the objective by defining the problem. The definition decided upon is: “To reduce the delinquency associated with manually underwritten applications.” At this stage, he also will determine what is within the scope of the project and what is outside the scope. For example: Which products are to be reviewed? Which systems? Can terms and conditions be changed? What parts of the system can be changed?

He next determines what can be measured and the source of data. An important part of this Measure phase is whether external data and information are available. He maps the process at a high level. In quality process terms, this is called COPIS analysis (customer, output, process, input, supplier). In this example, the supplier may be a retailer or dealer submitting the application form. In risk terms, the supplier may be the new business department which keys the applications.

The Input is the data received for the decision making and the Output is the decision made by the underwriter. The customer is the business – the objective of optimized profitability through high acceptance and low delinquency. Looking at the process followed by the underwriters – assessing the information, reviewing bureau records, requesting additional information, validating and checking information – provides the risk manager with an appreciation of the factors that are critical to the underwriter’s decision.

The additional information required is the subsequent performance of accounts to assess the quality of decisions. He also may request a bureau record (“credit referencing”) to infer the performance of rejected applications.

The Analysis phase is standard fare for the risk manager: What are the predictive variables? What are the correlations? Based on the analysis, the risk manager should be able to identify the factors that, when adjusted, produce the impact on the underwriting delinquency he is looking for.

Then, in the Improve phase, he considers a range of potential solutions and evaluates which will produce the best fit to the desired result. In this example, he identifies that the solution is to provide score boundaries and limits which the underwriters must operate within.

The solution is implemented in the Control phase. The risk manager also implements a feedback process – reports that monitor adherence to the rules and performance of the underwriters. However, this is where Six Sigma in credit risk differs. The risk manager will usually maintain a control environment where certain, randomly selected deals are underwritten “blind” of the score and rules. Solutions in risk management are rarely static, and risk managers strive to find the optimal solution. In total quality management (TQM) terminology, this is called continuous improvement. In Six Sigma, the concentration is on the Improve and Control phases

Figure 1 is how DMAIC is typically illustrated – a process from Define to Control. Figure 2 illustrates how risk management solutions rarely stop at Control. They continuously loop through the application of challenger solutions or strategies to Improve.

Of course the solution may uncover a further issue (e.g., the depth of the bureau records is not a fair reflection of an applicant’s liabilities). In that case, a new DMAIC process could be initiated.

Figure 1: The DMAIC Process

Figure 2: The DMAIC Process for Risk Management

Doing the Day-to-Day Job

If any of the things a risk manager does regularly do not fit into the pattern of a Six Sigma process, he should seriously ask himself why he is doing them.

Scorecard development is a straightforward project. However, before a risk manager starts the development, he should be asking what the objective is. Is it to increase automation, drive sales, drive balance growth, or reduce bad debts? In other words, the Define phase. Is there a problem or an entitlement issue? If there is not, the risk manager should question why he is planning to build a scorecard. The scorecard may be part of a solution. If the organization has a rolling scorecard development plan, the risk manager should ask himself what the benefits of a redevelopment will be. There could be better things to which resources could be applied. Not all new scorecards turn out to be better than their predecessors.

Champion/challenger testing is core to much of what risk managers do. This is part of the feedback loop between Control and Improve. Here the risk manager should be designing tests that will drive bottom line benefits. Quantify the potential impact. Use Pareto analysis to determine the most appropriate. Some lenders pride themselves on the number of challenger strategies they are running. However, high numbers of challengers usually means a lack of focus on what will be most significant. This is the solution stage where the objective is the benefits from the critical factors.

Portfolio monitoring is the feedback on a portfolio. Doing it in isolation of Six Sigma means a lack of focus; it can turn into reporting for the sake of reporting. The problem is that something might happen or be happening, and without a benchmark and understanding of the goal and the implications, an opportunity may be missed. Or worse, a looming disaster may not be identified.

So monitoring requires determination of the CTQ metric. Set a benchmark and identify significant variation. If a risk manager is monitoring something that is not a CTQ of a process, he is wasting time.

Continue reading

Customer-Centric Risk Management Via Hoshin Planning

The new millennium brought a great deal of change in the marketplace. As the financial scandals of the 1990s came to light, new regulations were drafted and put into place to avoid such occurrences in the future. U.S. financial institutions must comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which came on the heels of the Enron scandal, and the portions of the Basel II accords, which address the global impact of a credit crisis.

Most companies are already reviewing and documenting what processes to implement in order to meet the requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley regulations. Compliance is required this year. Financial regulators in the United States are adopting only some of the Basel II accords – but the adopted areas are very complicated. Institutions with $250 billion in assets or more than $10 billion of total foreign exposure on their balance sheet are required to comply. The compliance date for Basel II is 2007.

Applying Six Sigma to These Regulations

So how does Six Sigma apply to understanding and managing risk and complying with these regulations? Should the compliance effort be simply an audit task or should it be a best practice strategy?

Companies which do not have a framework in place to execute continuous process improvement are likely to treat Sarbanes-Oxley and Basel II requirements as a one-time project (a project which just integrates the minimum requirements of the regulations) or as one more just-in-time audit activity. But if a company makes compliance a best practices strategy, then that means alignment across the organization for people, processes and technology. Hence, Sarbanes-Oxley and Basel II become a part of the risk management philosophy that uses the best aspects of Lean Six Sigma.

Risk management is a discipline historically thought of as a way to avoid problems, not create new solutions. In a Lean Six Sigma culture, risk management issues become a way of improving processes and transcending functional tasks to allow for an improved customer experience.

The illustration below depicts how a company can best address its risk management capabilities. At the lowest levels of the continuous process improvement curve, companies are simply monitoring compliance requirements and being reactive at best. As a company moves up the curve, its ability to utilize Lean Six Sigma tools to address risk management capabilities increases. From a cultural perspective, the organization changes from one that is event-driven and constantly putting out fires, to one that utilizes an effective and proactive approach in a “project way of life,” and finally reaches the highest level where a Six Sigma culture attains a “process way of life.”

Continuous Process Improvement Curve

Treating Risk Management Like a Process

So what are the Lean Six Sigma tools that can best be applied to the risk management arena and help a financial institution gain competitive advantage in the process? There are just as many tools in the Lean Six Sigma tool kit as there are applications to the risk management process. The reason: To be successful risk management needs to be treated like a process just like mortgage loans and item processing. A great place to start making this happen is giving risk management an equal place in the strategy of the company. Some of the most successful customer-focused companies, such as Hewlett Packard, Xerox and Bank of America, do strategy in a Six Sigma way through Hoshin Kanri.

As the Hoshin planning process has evolved in financial services organizations utilizing Lean Six Sigma, it has developed into a business tool that influences best practices across numerous lines of business. Stemming from the utilization of operational risk dashboards with the definition of the proper operational risk metrics, the Hoshin planning process can be enhanced to track and improve performance in managing the aspects of risk that affect associates, customers and shareholders.

Hoshin planning plays a key role by allowing the operational risk planning team to concentrate on the most meaningful metrics that lead to successful strategic execution. The data collection process becomes more efficient through many software products now available to deal specifically with Sarbanes- Oxley and Basel II. As recently as three years ago, the process of collecting metrics and consolidating them into a functional scorecard could take weeks. Now, this process takes a couple of days, and allows all associates to access a scorecard via the company’s intranet. This timely enhancement allows teams to update strategic goals regularly, aligning them in accordance with changes in the business environment.

One Company-wide Six Sigma Operation Risk Plan

Also, lines of business progress towards established operational risk goals within the Hoshin plan can be presented through a vast amount of information. Reporting spreadsheets, a balanced business scorecard, and performance plans – once considered separate items – can all be captured under one company-wide Six Sigma operational risk plan. An operational risk Hoshin plan becomes the foundation of the review systems required by Sarbanes-Oxley and Basel II. The manageable, actionable metrics of the Hoshin plan provide structure and discipline in a highly dynamic environment. The flexibility of the Hoshin plan also is important, because metrics may take on new meaning if external risk factors shift a current business environment.

An operational risk management leadership team also should use Kanri as the second step to incorporate Hoshin planning into its regular management routines. While a Hoshin plan captures a team’s strategy, Kanri is a management process that focuses on the Hoshin plan and its tactical execution. Significant improvements in key process indicators around operational risk management occur with the inclusion of the Hoshin plan in monthly business reviews. The Hoshin plan should act as a means to judge business goals and drive operational risk decisions in the everyday, business-as-usual environment. By utilizing Kanri within an operational risk Hoshin plan, each of the strategies will be linked to their corresponding metrics, so financial institutions in a process-oriented and proactive-way can easily see how they are measuring up to the requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley and Basel II.

Conclusion: Reduce Risk/Be More Competitive

In summary, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Basel II are all about managing risk (financial, fraud, credit market or operational). Executives should understand that reducing risk will make their institutions more competitive. Banks that lower risks will be the winners in the marketplace. Risk management should become a “best practices strategy,” aligning data, technology, people and processes across the organization, and not an “audit compliance task.” Ultimately, companies should adopt a risk management philosophy that evolves from discrete events and projects into a risk management process that can become a key breakthrough strategy in a Hoshin plan and can leverage all the best aspects of Lean Six Sigma.

Continue reading

Project Risk Analysis & Management

Proper risk management is control of possible future events that may have a negative effect on the overall project. It is more of pro-active then reactive process.

What is Risk Analysis in Project Management?

Risk Analysis is the sequence of processes of risk management planning, analysis of risks, identification and controlling risk on a project.

Risk Management Process primarily involves following activities

1. Plan risk management

It is the procedure of defining how to perform risk management activities for a project.

2. Identify risk

It is the procedure of determining which risk may affect the project most. This process involves documentation of existing risks.

The input for identifying risk will be

◈ Risk management plan
◈ Project scope statement
◈ Cost management plan
◈ Schedule management plan
◈ Human resource management plan
◈ Scope baseline
◈ Activity cost estimates
◈ Activity duration estimates
◈ Stakeholder register
◈ Project documents
◈ Procurement documents
◈ Communication management plan
◈ Enterprise environmental factor
◈ Organizational process assets
◈ Perform qualitative risk analysis
◈ Perform quantitative risk analysis
◈ Plan risk responses
◈ Monitor and control risks

The output of the process will be a

◈ Risk register

3. Perform qualitative risk analysis

It is the process of prioritizing risks for further analysis or action by combining and assessing their probability of occurrence and impact. It helps managers to lessen the uncertainty level and concentrate on high priority risks.



Plan risk management should take place early in the project, it can impact on various aspects like cost, time, scope, quality and procurement.

The inputs for qualitative risk analysis includes

◈ Risk management plan
◈ Scope baseline
◈ Risk register
◈ Enterprise environmental factors
◈ Organizational process assets

The output of this stage would be

◈ Project documents updates

4. Quantitative risk analysis

It is the procedure of numerically analyzing the effect of identified risks on overall project objectives. In order to minimize the project uncertainty, this kind of analysis are quite helpful for decision making.

The input of this stage is

◈ Risk management plan
◈ Cost management plan
◈ Schedule management plan
◈ Risk register
◈ Enterprise environmental factors
◈ Organizational process assets

While the output will be

◈ Project documents updates

5. Plan risk responses

To enhance opportunities and to minimize threats to project objectives plan risk response is helpful. It addresses the risks by their priority, activities into the budget, schedule, and project management plan.

The inputs for plan risk responses are

◈ Risk management plan
◈ Risk register

While the output are

◈ Project management plan updates
◈ Project documents updates

6. Control Risks

Control risk is the procedure of tracking identified risks, identifying new risks, monitoring residual risks and evaluating risk.

The inputs for this stage includes

◈ Project management plan
◈ Risk register
◈ Work performance data
◈ Work performance reports

The output of this stage would be

◈ Work performance information
◈ Change requests
◈ Project management plan updates
◈ Project documents updates
◈ Organizational process assets updates

Project Procurement Management

Project Procurement Management includes the processes of purchasing or acquiring products needed to run a business. The organization can be a seller, buyer or service provider.

Project Procurement Management also includes controlling any contract issued by an outside organization and get work done outside the project team.

Plan Procurement Management includes four stages like

◈ Plan Procurement Management
◈ Conduct Procurements
◈ Control Procurements
◈ Close Procurements

The input in the plan procurement management are

◈ Requirements documentation
◈ Teaming agreements
◈ Risk register
◈ Scope baseline
◈ Project schedule
◈ Activity cost estimates
◈ Cost performance baseline
◈ Risk related contract decisions
◈ Enterprise environmental factors
◈ Organizational process assets

Conduct Procurement process

Conduct Procurement process involves activities like

◈ Selecting a seller
◈ Receiving seller responses
◈ Awarding a contract

The benefit of conducting procurement process is that it provides alignment of external and internal stakeholder expectations through established agreements.

The input of the conduct procurement process includes

◈ Project management plan
◈ Documents for procurement
◈ Source selection criteria
◈ Qualified seller list
◈ Seller proposals
◈ Project documents
◈ Make or buy decisions
◈ Teaming agreements
◈ Organizational process assets

Control Procurements

It is the process of monitoring contract performance and correction to the contract as per the guidelines. It will ensure that buyers and sellers both meet the procurement requirement according to the terms of the legal agreement.

The input of the Control Procurements include

◈ Project management plan
◈ Procurement documents
◈ Agreements
◈ Approved change requests
◈ Work performance reports
◈ Work performance data

The output includes

◈ Work performance information
◈ Change requests
◈ Project management plan updates
◈ Project documents updates
◈ Organizational process assets updates

Close procurements

This step involves documenting agreements and other documents for future reference.

The input of this tool includes

◈ Project management plan
◈ Procurement documents

The output of this tool includes

◈ Closed procurements
◈ Organizational process assets updates

Manage Stakeholder Engagement

A stakeholder is an integral part of any project; their decision can leave a deep impact on project deliverables. In this process, the first part is to identify people, groups or organizations that could impact on the project while the second part is to analyze stakeholder expectations.

It also focusses on continuous communication with stakeholders to understand their needs and expectations.

Identifying Stakeholders

It is the process of identifying the groups, people or organization that can influence project outcomes. It allows the project manager to identify appropriate stakeholders.

Plan Stakeholder Management

It is the process of preparing a strategy to involve stakeholders throughout the project life cycle. It defines clear, actionable plan to interact with project Stakeholders.

The input for Plan Stakeholder Management includes

◈ Project management plan
◈ Stakeholder register
◈ Enterprise environmental factors
◈ Organizational process assets

The output of this

◈ Stakeholder management plan
◈ Project documents updates

Manage Stakeholder Engagement

In this stage, stakeholder are communicated to understand their expectations, address issues and foster appropriate stakeholder engagement in project activities. It allows the project manager to achieve project success without conflicting with stakeholder's decision.

The input of this stage is

◈ Stakeholder management plan
◈ Communication management plan
◈ Change log
◈ Organization process assets

While the output of this stage is

◈ Issue log
◈ Change request
◈ Project management plan updates
◈ Project documents updates
◈ Organizational process assets updates

Control Stakeholder Engagement

It is the process of monitoring stakeholder engagement in the project and adjusting strategies as per requirements. It will increase the stakeholder engagement activities as the project evolves and progresses.

The input for this stage include

◈ Project management plan
◈ Issue log
◈ Work performance data
◈ Project documents

The output of this stage include

◈ Work performance information
◈ Change requests
◈ Project management plan updates
◈ Project documents updates
◈ Organizational process assets updates

Continue reading